When living in a foreign country, you have to keep an open mind regarding cultural differences. We tend to take our culture and lifestyle for granted and not consider understanding a different way. My work as the native English speaker at a vocational high school in Italy is a cultural difference in itself. It seems that everything about education in Italy is different than in the United States. Little by little, piece by piece, after speaking to various teachers, students at my school and students from different schools with whom I do private lessons, I was able to grasp the education system here. Then, a couple of weeks ago, I taught a lesson to my students on Education in America and had them in turn discuss the education system in Italy and the differences. I'm glad that I waited a while to speak about education because my immediate reactions were mainly of shock and I had to force myself to think about the advantages and disadvantages of both systems.
The first week I was in Brescia, I received my schedule at Golgi as a timetable with blocks filled in with class titles like "3A GRA" and "5B TUR." As I left the general meeting with the Foreign Language teachers, I asked my adviser the obvious question [at least in my mind], who are the teachers for each class and where are their classrooms? She brought me to a large poster board where I saw each "class" had a room. Then I realized, "Each class has one classroom?" My adviser laughed and said, "Oh yes, we move to them. They don't move to us." Once I taught my first couple of weeks, I discovered that the students not only stay in the same classroom all day, but they sit at the same desks next to the same students all day long. All day long, all year long. Most Italian high schools go from Monday until Saturday in the mornings. My school starts at 8 am and ends at 2 pm, except on Saturdays when it ends at 1 pm instead. They don't have a lunch break during school hours but instead just a 10-minute break from 10:53 until 11:53 am where they can go outside in the courtyard to smoke or to the bar to fight for a sandwich or coffee.
At the end of my first month in October, I started doing private conversation lessons with the son of a math teacher at my school. Her son speaks very well in English and has done private lessons with the English Language Assistants before me at Golgi for the past two years. One of his first questions during our introduction lesson was about American high schools because he had just seen the movie High School Musical. He wanted to know whether we really have lockers in the hallways of our schools. I explained that we do have them because we switch classrooms for all of our classes and store our books in our lockers instead of in the one classroom we don't have. I then explained that we have different classmates as well. His response: "but ... how do you make friends?" Throughout the 6 months that I've been here, I've watched my students and how they interact together. They are really close. Not even close, but really affectionate with each other. I don't see many outcasts. In the end, every student knows really well all the other students because they spend every hour of every school day together. Sometimes, when you are stuck with the same group of people for a long period of time, you begin to hate each other. It's too much time together. But after a certain threshold ... you learn to respect the things you might have hated before. In the end, people are the way they are. My gut reaction was the opposite of my private lesson student's: how do you make friends if you don't switch classmates? Well, maybe it's better to not have the chance to choose. They get stuck with a class and they have to get over what they dislike and learn to accept and respect each other.
For one of my lessons in the fall, I asked my students to respond true or false to the statement: "Everybody is basically selfish." The idea was to respond to each others' ideas in a debate. Most of my classes did not end up in a debate because they could not understand well what their classmates said or their responses were too basic to debate. I was about to switch gears during my lesson with one class, when out of the blue one of the students raised his hand and said that he didn't agree. I had about three students start debating their viewpoints and it was fabulous! After the lesson I said to the teacher, except for the fact that not all of the class understand what the few students were saying, "that was exactly what I wanted to happen!" She responded, "Yeah, that was great. Except that none of them are my students." Huh? The students who responded to what each other said were all "new" to the class this year. They transferred to Golgi from other schools. That is when I learned that not only do the students stay in the same classrooms with the same classmates for an entire year, but they stay in the same class with the same classmates for all five years of high school. Usually, the school tries to keep them with the same teachers in a subject like English for at least two or three years. What the teacher I was working with meant then was that she had this exact class last year and the students who spoke and understood the most English were not in the class the year before with her. The numbers for my classes like 3A, 5B refer to the year and section so that 3A next year will be 4A then 5A or 3B to 4B to 5B. When do the classmates change from year to year? When students fail or switch schools [most likely if they switch to Golgi, it means they failed at a better school].
Better school? Do I mean private schools? No, no. There are many different "types" of high schools in Italy and even more, the high schools are specialized. There are high schools [liceo], technical schools [istituto tecnico] and professional/vocational schools [istituto professionale]. The liceo prepares students for college and are specialized into classic, scientific and language high schools. The technical and professional schools prepare students for the workforce in a specific profession. While both schools of this category are lower than liceo, istituto tecnico is a tier higher than istituto professionale. Golgi is an istituto professionale and has sectors in Chemistry, Tourism, and Graphic Design/Advertising to prepare their students to be lab technicians, travel agents or tour guides, and graphic designers. Again, on my schedule the 3A GRA and 5B TUR mean third year, section A of graphic design [grafico] and fifth year, section A of tourism [turistico]. The curriculum at the schools vary greatly. In English, students at liceo learn in one year what students at Golgi learn in three. Grammar and vocabulary. No wonder there are students who stand out much greater than others! My best speakers went to a liceo for one or two years and after failing, they decided to switch to Golgi because it is easier. They are mainly reviewing at Golgi the material they already learned [but failed] at another school.
When I taught my lesson on education, one of the teachers asked me about standardized exams at the end of the year. I explained that our tests vary by state and there are different requirements to graduate depending on the school. She explained that the students at Golgi take exams at the end of the year to "pass" the year. They must pass their exams in all subjects to pass the entire year. If they don't pass one subject, they can take the exam again in September, if they don't pass it again they have to retake the entire year. They have to retake the ENTIRE year. This means that they will be held back and put in a new class coming up from the year before. No wonder my students range from ages 15 - 22!! At liceo, my private students tell me, students only fail in the first year. But at the lowest type of school like Golgi, of course they fail often. I taught them the song "Don't Stop Believing" this week and asked them to comment on their favorite lines. I had a lot of responses saying to not give up on your dreams or goals. Their goals are to pass the year, not one course, but the year.
To explain our public high schools and the curriculum we follow, I highlighted that each student has their own individual schedule because they choose levels of courses and electives. I explained that we have "specific" courses that we take, pass or fail and that depending on the high school, we have different classmates in all of our classes. The idea of the individual schedule was completely new to them because they join the school in their first year and the school sets the curriculum for the five years of a particular program like graphic design or tourism and accordingly, each class has a schedule. Even though we are not "specialized" in the United States, the options of levels and electives means that we can study more intensely subjects for which we have a personal affinity, for example advanced courses in science and math and extra courses as electives if we choose. When I taught this lesson at Golgi, I really felt like I was explaining a better system in America.When I spoke to a private lesson student later, I saw some advantages.
In my lesson plan, I used a worksheet I found on my program's website with questions about my students' classmates. How long have they been studying with the same students? Do they like studying with the same students for so long, does it help them learn well? Later, as I asked these questions to my private lesson student, he asked me the same in return. It was then I realized that by the end of high school, I took most of my classes with the same students. I had already explained to him how in New York State and at my public high school, we had regents, honors and advanced placement [AP] classes. With one or two sections of AP classes depending on the subject, those of us who took all AP when they were offered were in all of our main classes together. Likewise, usually the same students took honors classes over regents. While there were students in my high school with whom I had many classes, there were many with whom I had none. As if we didn't even go to the same school? In the Italian system, instead of choosing your level of courses as in my high school being regents, honors, or AP, the students choose their "level" of school being istituto professionale, istituto tecnico, or liceo. Instead of choosing the individual courses they are more interested in as electives or levels of courses where they might excel, they choose a school which sets the program in their interests like the classics, sciences, or tourism.
I still have to admit that the system still bothers me. These students are locked into a specialized high school for five years with the same students for those five years if they don't fail. It might be easier to switch schools after just completing one year, but the focus of the material covered is so different that they can't switch often or without being held back a year. If I compare the two systems side by side, I see opposite ideologies. The foundation of the American version seems to come from liberty and opportunity whereas the Italian from consistency and practicality. The idea of our public schools allows the flexibility of students to continuously make choices year after year to reach their potential with an equal base of knowledge. Granted, I am not assuming that all public high schools in the US successfully do this, I'm merely using my own experience in a public high school to generalize and compare with what I see in the high schools here. The idea then of Italian high schools comes from the idea that it is more practical to separate and streamline students to either university or the workforce and thus either professional or unprofessional careers. Yes, some of the kids at my school will apply and go to university. But, they will be behind other students in their studies. I don't see this system letting students reach their potential as they grow but instead locking them into a particular role.
At first, I saw only disadvantages of this system. How could this ever possibly sound like a good idea? But, we come from different backgrounds, you can't judge without understanding those cultural differences. Americans theoretically hold the philosophy of social mobility very dear. Liberty and equality come from the founding of our country as opposed to an amendment of a cultural tradition. We have different philosophies on society and these will naturally leak into ideologies on education. I see a greater amount of diversity and the encouraging of diversity with more choice in the American system, likewise in our culture of immigrants. There is not the same emphasis here. Although I feel like some of my students are being shortchanged because of grades and a mindset in middle school that got them to Golgi years ago, you have to respect the advantages that are present. They made a choice and then they stick to it.